past were still openly operated, but now the job function email list Kuomintang faction is gradually moving to the ground. Moreover, when the Kuomintang is not enthusiastic about the line debate, the faction will not advertise a specific line and policy too much. The original intention of the faction was to advocate policy, but now it is more and more inclined to fight for positions In the general sense of society, factions are regarded as the main culprit of political division of spoils, the formation of oligarchy and even the split within the party, but in fact it is not always the case.
First of all, if there are groups, there will be factions. Groups that do not involve power are unavoidable, and political parties are even more unavoidable. Second, factions have contributed to the cultivation and supply of talents, nurturing the junior generation, checking and balancing the violence of the party's executive departments, and expanding the party's ruling foundation. It is not appropriate to view factions in a one-size-fits-all way. The DPP, the Kuomintang—and any political party—are bound to have factions, but the current difficulty lies in the fact that under the two-vote system in a single constituency, as the nomination rights of the Party Central Committee have been expanded, factions are used to check and balance the violent rush of the party’s executive departments. Both the
DPP and the KMT are faced with such a lack of internal discussion, which leads to a deficit of democracy within the party. The Kuomintang invites party-member county mayors to communicate (2) Photo Credit: WebMD In the absence of internal discussions, the various policy discourses within the two parties are also gradually fatigued, unlike a hundred flowers blooming twenty years ago. All kinds of results have led to the biggest crisis of the current bipartisan faction: only the function of fighting for positions and supplying talents is left. Such factions can only seek power from those in power, which is not helpful to the development of democracy and pluralism within the party, and it is difficult to expand the mass base. It is not that no one wants to change this political ecology from the institutional perspective, and the